Sometimes cultural attitudes shift in thought and philosophy, reshaping the way we think and the way we respond to certain events be they sociological, spiritual, or economic. I recall as a child growing up in the 60s, many young adults had an "anti-war" mentality that resulted in a type of disdain for anyone who would enlist in the military or even accept the draft. The "heroes" of the time were not those fighting for human freedom and trying to end the tyranny but rather those who evaded the draft and carried peace signs. Returning troops were sometimes booed and hissed as they disembarked from a plane upon their return from the fighting. Students talked naively and inanely about an "immoral" war and the benefits of isolationism.
Yet time marched onward, as it is wont to do, and now society holds in high regard those brave men and women who fought and currently fight for our country and for our freedoms we enjoy. We honor and elevate the military as it defends our country, fights for democracy, and wars against terrorism. We as a society have changed and will continue to do so in some way. Those not in favor of military service remain silent. Cultural shifting gives us more tolerance for differences, public concern about the environment, less dogma, awareness of global trends, more medical breakthroughs, fewer physical books, more knowledge, social connectivity, and maybe less dependence on one person. Technology provides, at least to an extent, the knowledge needed to catapult our interests to another level.
Being a hat wearer, I have noticed pictures from the first half of the twentieth century showing that most men wore hats. It is always a pleasure to walk into an old building and find a hat rack. Today students often wear caps but they leave them on in a building and there are rarely, if ever, hat racks. Society changed and the bald, hat wearing man is now discriminated against and has no place to hang his hat! But we will arise and our time will come again. With our ascension into our rightful place, we will see the return of the hat rack (actually I kind of doubt it will happen!).
The growth of the non-denominational church came partly in response to denominational restrictions and the frequent parlaying of theological ideals within each church. Growing weary of such dissension, people began to form their own churches apart from denominational association. While the loss in collective giving has been painful, for many the freedom is worth the loss. Such activity is an example of shifting cultural changes in spiritual formation.
In higher education, we are in a change of some kind with a multitude of opinions and shifting attitudes toward education and the future. Many will argue that college can no longer serve its liberal arts practices and that all training should be professional and career-oriented. Others hold steadfastly to the liberal arts concept of higher education that respects the well-rounded thinker, the graduate with knowledge in many areas, the student who contributes to society through refinement, who recognizes the heritage of our world but who possesses the skill to avoid past mistakes, the person whose mind and body have the discipline for facing the future with courage, conviction, and productivity. All these goals and more comprise the purpose of the liberal arts education.
But the flurry of professional and technical schools now threatens the core of a liberal arts education. Students, their parents, even politicians are no longer focusing on the benefits of a broad-based education that includes history, math, science, English, arts, philosophy, and physical well being. Instead, the concern seems to be gainful employment upon graduation and the skills needed for career success. In this case, the customer has moved from the faculty member to the student to the employer. Do we in traditional liberal arts institutions retain our heritage of the liberal arts that goes back to Greek philosophers and forms the core of what it means to be an educated person? Or do we discard all that liberal arts represents and simply teach the skills and knowledge required for a chosen profession? The old adage of teach a man to fish and you feed him for a lifetime can be argued on either side of the equation. Should we give him the knowledge needed to fish, hunt, farm, cook? Should we teach him to fish so that he works to alleviate world hunger, invest resources, contribute positively to society? Does he need to understand the environment, physics, biology, business, the arts, his own health, the chemical makeup of fish, perhaps other languages in case he encounters people from foreign countries?
The question, however, is what to do? What do students need to know for their future? Specific skills or broad knowledge or both? Where will we land on this controversy? Will we abandon the educational practices that have served higher education so well or do we desperately hold on to a model that no longer is effective? Is there a balance?
The road to truth is often painful but clear and it seems to me that the answer lies in an eclectic and guided curriculum with a directed and comprehensive invoking of technology. Colleges must be nimble, holding to the ideals of what an education means but respecting employers' need for skilled employees and entrepreneurship. Obviously supply and demand will ultimately rule the day and will shape the forces of college curriculum, but meanwhile it is time for colleges and employers to recognize those areas that technology can provide and those areas where face to face learning needs to happen. Not entirely sure of the answer, I believe a reduction in broad liberal arts courses, increased choice in classes, and professional tracks toward employment are the trajectories of the colleges of the future. Thrown in the mix will be more use of technology, online courses, video, experiential learning, and interactive education.
Rather than fighting the change and insisting on the past, colleges must embrace the change if they are to survive. Schools with substantial endowments will continue the journey established by the past, but other schools must find new ways to educate students for the future. Such is the way of cultural change.
No comments:
Post a Comment